Vojnosanitetski pregled 2013 Volume 70, Issue 9, Pages: 871-873
https://doi.org/10.2298/VSP1309871G
Full text (
405 KB)
Cited by
Drug-related pityriasis rubra pilaris with acantholysis
Gajinov Zorica T. (Clinical Centre of Vojvodina, Dermatovenereological Clinic, Novi Sad)
Matić Milan B. (Clinical Centre of Vojvodina, Dermatovenereological Clinic, Novi Sad)
Duran Verica D. (Clinical Centre of Vojvodina, Dermatovenereological Clinic, Novi Sad)
Vučković Nada
(Clinical Centre of Vojvodina, Institute for Pathology, Novi Sad)
Prcić Sonja T. (Institute for Child Youth Health, Novi Sad)
Vujanović Ljuba M. (Clinical Centre of Vojvodina, Dermatovenereological Clinic, Novi Sad)
Introduction. Acantholysis is rarely reported histological feature of
Pityriasis rubra pilaris (PRP), recently recognized as having diagnostic
specificity for differentiating PRP from psoriasis. Case report. Adult male
patient one week after the introduction of simvastatin had experienced
pruritic erythemo-squamous eruption on head and upper trunk that in a month
progressed to erythrodermia, with islands of sparing. Histological picture
combined pemphigus-like acantholysis with alternating hyper- and
parakeratosis, follicular plugs and dermal inflammation, and confirmed the
clinical diagnosis of classic adult type 1 PRP. Acitretin therapy resulted in
a resolution of skin disease. Patch test with simvastatin was negative,
scratch test was positive, and it was estimated that potential risk of oral
challenge with simvastatin outweighed actual need for it. Drug triggering PRP
episode is the most likely explanation for temporal relation between the
start of simvastatin treatment and skin eruption. Conclusion. In management
of rare inflammatory skin disease, such as PRP, we have to carefully observe
and evaluate not only diagnostic features but possible external influences on
its course also.
Keywords: pityriasis rubra pilaris, simvastatin, diagnosis, drug therapy, treatment outcome